Pre-Paid Legal (PPD) offers what amounts to ?legal insurance?, where customers purchase a membership subscription and in return receive legal coverage for such incidents as traffic violations, trial defense, will preparation, identify theft, and so forth. Memberships are mainly sold to middle income individuals or families, and monthly fees range from about $15-25, with some products, such as the identity theft shield, extra. The company contracts with small legal firms around the U.S. and Canada, usually driving the bulk of business for these firms through customer referrals. This makes the relationships pretty solid, with most of the firms with PPD for over 8 years. Pre-Paid Legal pays these firms a monthly fixed fee that does not change based on the benefits realized by subscribers.
This fact eliminates nearly all claims risk that most insurance companies face, making Pre-Paid less of an insurance provider and more of a referral company.
Let s address the positives first. Financially, Pre-Paid Legal s business model is an attractive one. Capital requirements are low for this kind of product, which allows the company to put up nice MFI return on capital (108%) and free cash flow (14% free cash margin) numbers. Management has been generous with this free cash flow, returning it to shareholders by aggressively repurchasing shares over the past 5 years.
Shares outstanding have declined at a 6.7% per year clip in that period. Competitively, there are virtually no prepaid legal plan providers that target individual families. Nearly all competitors focus on larger employer groups, creating a nice niche for Pre-Paid to operate in.
The company s marketing structure is very low cost and scales up and down naturally with the number of subscriptions sold.
Speaking of the marketing plan though, it s a multi-level marketing (MLM) strategy ? also known as a ?pyramid scheme?. Pre-Paid recruits independent salespeople who sell the product and recruit associates to do the same, earning commissions on both their own and their associate s sales. If you ve ever been roped into Amway or Avon (AVP), you know how this works. it usually doesn t! About 98% of its ?associates? earn less than $250 per year selling product. As a result, Pre-Paid has to consistently renew its salesperson base, as generally over half of it turns over every year. While this leads to new one-time enrollment fee payments for new salespeople, it also leads to a lot of inexperienced and unqualified people hawking the product.
This turns prospective customers off to the company and creates a bad reputation.
Scour Google and you will find no shortage of complaints against the company (here for starters). It s not just the obnoxious MLM marketing, either. At least Amway and Avon have respected products.
Pre-Paid s legal coverages are fairly narrow. Hours covered in pre-trial expenses are anemic, usually less than 3 hours, with the rest fully payable by the member. Alcohol related vehicle incidents, a rather common occurrence, are not covered at all. IRS audit protection and will preparation coverage are both of little value; audit protection is usually provided by tax prep firms, and will creation can be easily done using computer software. I just don t see much value in these memberships.
Few individuals or families will face a need for these protections in any given year.
Recently, the company has run into even more problems. The FTC and SEC are currently investigating the company. The FTC is concerned with the issues outlined above regarding the product and treatment of associates. The SEC is investigating the company s stock repurchase plan, which as mentioned above is very aggressive.
One concern here is that Pre-Paid issues generous amounts of stock to management, who then sell it through the repurchase program at higher prices. Another concern is over the abrupt resignation of founder and long-time CEO Harland Stonecipher at the beginning of March. The timing is suspect, to say the least, as the government began to turn up the heat on what is clearly a questionable business strategy.
Add to these concerns the fact that operational metrics have been weak, and you have a MFI stock that is probably best avoided. Pre-Paid Legal has been seeing increasing weakness in their subscriber base numbers. New memberships have failed to cover the number of memberships cancelled, leading to slight declines in net subscribers.
Legal services are increasingly becoming more available to individuals through online based providers. Revenue fell 1.3% in 2009, and sales growth will probably be right around 0% in 2010. MagicDiligence does not see any compelling growth or moat argument for this company.
Last but not least, Pre-Paid Legal is not particularly strong financially. Cash is about $36 million, debt about $42 million, with the debt-to-equity ratio high at 110% (I like to see 75% or lower). While it is far from the biggest concern, it is yet another strike against the stock.
A MagicDiligence Membership gives you full access to the best stocks that Magic Formula Investing has to offer. Professional quality research, formal stock recommendations, timely updates, and exclusive investing tools are all at your fingertips, at one of the lowest prices in the entire investment world. Click here to learn more!
Joel Greenblatt and are not associated in any way with this website. Neither Mr. Greenblatt or endorse this website?s investment advice, strategy, or products. Investment recommendations on this website are not chosen by Mr.
Greenblatt, nor are they based on Mr. Greenblatt?s proprietary investment model, and are not chosen by. Magic Formula is a registered trademark of, which has no connection to this website.
The information on this website is for informational purposes only. No warranty is provided or implied as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of this information. This information may not be construed as investment advice of any kind.
The proprietor of this website is not responsible in any way for losses or damages resulting from the use of this information. Alexander Online Properties is not a registered investment advisor.
Steve, Did the short sellers hire you to write this? It s quite the hatchet job. In PPD s latest conference call they claim to have 47 million in cash and 32 million in debt. Your numbers are quite different to say the least.
I m not sure what your distaste for MLM sales techniques has to do with the cash flow of PPD. As far as operational metrics, PPD has experienced only the slightest of membership decline in the worst recession since the great depression. Quite impressive considering their customer is Joe Everyman who is suffering the woes of 10% unemployment. Also, who are you and why should anyone pay attention to what you write?
I see no links to you anywhere on the site.
The article represents my take on the investment given the facts available, which are all public record. They filed the latest quarterly yesterday, after I wrote the article, my numbers are from the previous quarter. So, kudos to PPD on paying down more of the debt.
I am a completely independent private investor with well over a decade of experience in portfolio management. As such, I have the ability to provide an unbiased and independent opinion of MFI stocks, without the extraneous motivations of those ?in the business?.
Source: http://xsiawyer.info/?p=273
cranberry sauce oregon usc la auto show powerball winning numbers powerball winning numbers uc davis pepper spray uc davis pepper spray
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.